Methodology

Understand how the Impakter Index brings together Klimado’s sustainability data and Impakter’s reporting, and how ESG priorities and sustainability scores are assigned using a transparent, data-driven methodology.

How it works

How the Impakter Index Works

A structured, repeatable process applied consistently across all organisations assessed by Klimado.

  1. Step 01

    Collect Company Data

    • Company information
    • Industry classification
    • Public sustainability disclosures
  2. Step 02

    Assign ESG Priority

    • Environmental
    • Social
    • Governance
  3. Step 03

    Evaluate Sustainability Factors

    • Sector risk
    • Company maturity
    • Public reporting
    • Certifications
    • Regional benchmark
  4. Step 04

    Generate Sustainability Score

    • Score range: 0 – 100
    • Bands: A to D, Starter

ESG priority

Assigning ESG Priority

Each organisation receives one primary ESG focus based on its core business sector using NACE industry classifications.

Environmental

Assigned to organisations whose operations have the greatest environmental impact.

Examples

  • Energy
  • Mining
  • Manufacturing
  • Agriculture
  • Water Utilities
  • Waste Management
  • Construction

Why this priority?

These sectors are primarily evaluated through emissions, resource use, pollution, biodiversity and energy efficiency.

Social

Assigned to organisations where workforce wellbeing, customer safety and community impact are the dominant ESG considerations.

Examples

  • Healthcare
  • Education
  • Retail
  • Hospitality
  • Consumer Products
  • NGOs
  • Public Services

Why this priority?

Performance depends heavily on labour standards, health and safety, customer welfare and social responsibility.

Governance

Assigned to organisations where transparency, regulation and compliance are the strongest sustainability drivers.

Examples

  • Banking
  • Insurance
  • Finance
  • Technology
  • Telecommunications
  • Consulting
  • Media

Why this priority?

These sectors are primarily evaluated through governance structures, compliance, cybersecurity, ethics and reporting practices.

Scoring

Scoring Methodology

Each organisation receives a Sustainability Score between 0 and 100 based on multiple weighted factors.

Sector Risk

Industries are evaluated according to their inherent sustainability risks.

High Risk40 – 80
Medium Risk50 – 85
Low Risk60 – 95

Company Maturity

Larger and more established organisations generally provide more comprehensive ESG reporting, certifications and governance practices.

  • ESG Reports
  • GRI
  • SASB
  • ISO Certifications
  • Audited Sustainability Reports

Data Availability

Companies with transparent public sustainability information receive additional scoring confidence.

  • Official Website
  • ESG Reports
  • Annual Reports
  • Certificates
  • Public Sustainability Data
+5 to +10−5 to −10

Regional Benchmark

Scores are calibrated against regional ESG maturity to ensure fair comparisons across different countries.

Nordic CountriesHigher ESG maturity
Central EuropeBalanced benchmark
Emerging MarketsAdjusted baseline

Score formula

How Final Scores Are Estimated

Overall Sustainability Score

Sector Base Score

Foundation

Company Maturity

Reporting depth

Data Availability

Transparency bonus

Sector Risk Adjustment

Risk penalty

Scores run from 0 to 100. As a reading guide, 75 and above indicates strong performance, 50 to 74 developing performance, and below 50 an early stage. A company that Klimado has not yet assessed is shown without a score.

Scores are Klimado’s assessment, not Impakter’s editorial judgement.

Scores can be withheld from this site while rating regulation is clarified; when they are, the Index is sorted alphabetically.

Examples

Example Calculations

See how the formula produces scores across three different industry types. The figures are illustrative; actual scores are Klimado’s assessment.

Manufacturing Company

Priority: Environmental

  • Sector Base55
  • Company Maturity+10
  • Data Availability+5
  • Risk Adjustment−5

Final Score

Developing performance

65

Financial Institution

Priority: Governance

  • Sector Base75
  • Company Maturity+10
  • Data Availability+5

Final Score

Strong performance

90

Retail Organisation

Priority: Social

  • Sector Base60
  • Company Maturity+10
  • Data Availability−5

Final Score

Developing performance

65

Our commitment

Our Commitment to Transparency

Transparent

Every score is Klimado’s assessment, based on publicly available information and a documented methodology.

Consistent

The same evaluation framework is applied across all organisations.

Comparable

Scores are normalised to enable meaningful comparisons between industries and countries.